argumate:

shieldfoss:

argumate:

afloweroutofstone:

Also, there are some instances where government ownership is not only defensible from an economic standpoint, but preferable. Utilities and infrastructure are the obvious examples, but Henry Calvert Simmons (one of the fathers of the Chicago School and one of Milton Friedman’s professors) made the argument back in 1934 that any industry which cannot be made properly competitive should be nationalized.

Natural monopolies!

Things get weird when you realise that increasing centralisation and economies of scale could result in a whole lot more things being natural monopolies than we would normally expect.

Time to break up Google and Amazon, I reckon.

>Utilities

The California water crisis would be a whole lot easier to solve if the water was sold on a free market basis, allowed to rise in price so the farmers would switch to less water-intensive crops.

Technically a government run natural monopoly can still charge a market price, eg. by auction where people can bid it up, where that makes sense.

Absolutely.

They don’t.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s